uXmtKvdrR0

Was written by indecent words (circle Office) complaint (copy)
Guangxi News Network reporter Wu Chi-wai text /
 
Together labor contract dispute, the plaintiff first instance verdict to the court access to case materials, find someone to write the complaint "dog × obligations do not require compensation issues and reason" and indecent words. August 24, Qinzhou City Intermediate People's Court official said, once verified, this is one of the Vice-President of the Court Qinbei is, was free to write, there is no point, there was no favoritism, capricious and arbitrary violations of law. Currently, Qinbei Court has criticized judges on the parties,http://hrr.ul.hirosaki-u.ac.jp, and has apologized to the plaintiff.
 
Check files to be "mine down."
 
Last year, Ms. Lu and Nanning, Qinzhou public company a labor contract dispute, the other court. The case heard by Qinzhou Qinbei People's Court.
 
Ms. Lu's husband Lee is her attorney. Lee said that in early December last year,hogan uomo outlet, the court issued a first instance verdict. The court for compensation for more than 1400 yuan, which his wife had very different demands, his wife refused to accept that it would continue to appeal.
 
December 8 last year, when Lee to court access to case materials, in a statement of claim last page to see someone wrote in the margin of two lines of text. On a line that says "dog ×'s" words, the next line is read, "no need to compensate for the obligations, issues and reasons" words.
 
Lee said that the two lines written beside his wife's signature, apparently "in text form disclosed abuse and insult", so that he and his wife both from spiritually, mentally, and even human dignity are subject to great harm. Meanwhile, think of the results of the verdict, the couple thought it was about the misinformation and the Judgment, causing them "throughout the proceedings unfair and unfavorable obviously in the passive situation."
 
There are two versions of the writing author
 
Lee said, two days after the incident, he was the first President of the Tribunal to the Court civil trial Sumou reflect this situation. Sumou said he has nothing to do with it, "our court written by others," and the same content on the spot to write a text, let Lee do the identification.
 
After one day, that is, on December 11 last year, Lee Sumou came home. "He said the word was written by someone else, but he is in charge, can not get away. He asked us not to make a big thing, want to share text he wrote back." Lee recalled, and after a few day, Sumou find him again, word is that the Chamber represents an expose written by surname Vice-President.
 
After Lee had found indecent words, they copy the complaint, this time to get handwriting samples SuMou, he put the two materials to Nanning, a Centre of Forensic Identification, unexpected results. Reporters saw, this testimonial Identification Center provided Mr. Xiang Li said, using a word of special labeling method are compared with each of the two test writing, found both in form with pen strokes with,nike tn requin pas cher, stroke and other characteristics, reflecting the same person writing habits and writing laws. Testimonial to the conclusion that the two writing is written by the same person, the implication is indecent words to Sumou should do.
 
Also in the incident, Lee again this reflects the discipline inspection and supervision departments to this Court. Last December 18, the other replied that he "is the strip surname Vice-President at the trial of the case is written."
 
It is understood that, in the first instance proceedings Luk this from the labor contract disputes, exposing a collegial panel of judges is the case.
 
Who exactly is the initiator
 
Lee said that with the progress of events, a number of departments Qinzhou had come forward to coordinate the matter. Once Qinbei court a responsible person, "he apologized to us and said sorry, and said has asked exposing a write a review." However, so that he and his wife are not satisfied that the person in charge is still called the word is written by exposing surname Vice-President.
 
Until today, Mr. and Mrs. Li still believe indecent words on the petition is Sumou should do. In their view, Sumou not collegial panel members of the original contract disputes,http://www.familyus.com/cgi-bin/guestbook/guestbook.cgi, "can actually view and requires judgment in the case, it is clearly written on the complaint," "belonging to others to handle cases of indirect intervention." But also the dissatisfaction that "in the evidence and the facts of the case clearly," Sumou never admitted to them that he wrote these words. Lee believes that exposing a just Sumou "scapegoat" and also suspected of perjury.
 
Mr. and Mrs. Li believe it was the intervention of a trial of another case of "evidence" that had that piece of labor contract disputes, after the Qinzhou City Intermediate People's Court, the verdict "very different": Luk get more than 10,000 yuan in compensation gold.
 
In July,hogan outlet sito ufficiale, Mr. and Mrs. Li submitted the complaint to the court Qinbei to reputation, personal rights and other grounds are violated, claim the Soviet Union, exposing the two public newspaper apology, compensation for economic losses of 1043 yuan, compensation for moral damage solatium 50,000 yuan. August 3, the court said in ruling on the prosecution inadmissible.
 
Municipal leaders concerned about the matter & nbsp; & nbsp;
 
It is understood that a copy of the complaint of indecent words on the issue,http://www.dab.hi-ho.ne.jp/cgi-bin/user/tamanegi/apeboard.cgi/"/, which has caused concern Qinzhou municipal leaders, asked relevant departments to investigate and deal with.
 
August 24, Qinzhou City Intermediate People's Court official said, the hospital's leadership on this matter very seriously, requiring serious investigation Qinbei court. The investigation, had labor contract disputes Luk Qinbei court at a public hearing, exposing a is one of three members of the full court, Sumou not a member. As a judge, then exposing a hand holding a copy of the plaintiff's complaint,http://www.wonvyou.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=107885, and the defendant's pleadings, evidence materials.
 
Typically, the court only to cover the plaintiff and the defendants have court-related businesses to check the seal of the original receipt tribunal archive material binding, and a copy of the material to be destroyed after finishing. A copy of the complaint case, the trial after being held in abeyance at the office of personnel in case of hosted and no external diffusion and publicity.
 
The investigation, indecent words on a copy of the complaint is indeed exposing a committed. Exposing a recognition of these words are "free to write, there is no meaning,louboutin soldes, no point, no Mashui, afterwards forget to write this sentence." In this regard, Qinzhou City Intermediate People's Court staff who had worked for many years with Sumou, said he was familiar with Sumou writing, after he carefully control over indecent text copy on that is not SuMou.
 
Lee provided the handwriting identification book, the relevant person in charge of Lee, Lee couples and Qinbei court after the occurrence of the dispute, handwriting identification work should go for examination by a third party independent organization,http://meguru.jp/cgi-bin/joyful/./joyful.cgi,tn requin pas cher, rather than as one of the parties , so that it credibility.
 
The official also said that the Luk labor contract dispute case, exposing a non-existent violations of favoritism, capricious and arbitrary, while Sumou though a President, but did not interfere with normal hearing the case , there was no violations of capricious and arbitrary. & Nbsp; & nbsp;
 
Head of the hospital explained the reason & nbsp; & nbsp;
 
If there is no intervention in the first trial, the second trial verdict why there are variations in the hospital? 24, Qinzhou City Intermediate People's Court, the official told reporters on the matter specifically described.
 
The responsible person, Ms. Lu's labor contract dispute case, one of the main question is whether she should receive compensation for overtime. The facts found and the second trial of first instance are basically the same, the Court of First Instance ruling will be to maintain a reasonable part of the law. But in the second instance, according to the evidence, the fact that the appellant overtime Luk exist, she advocated for overtime and provide evidence of this, the appellant challenged, but failed to provide "Luk refute claims not paid in full sufficient evidence of overtime, "the burden of proof can not be respondent should bear the consequences of. Second instance verdict, also taking into account the legitimate interests of the maintenance workers.
 
The responsible person, after the entry into force of a second trial, Mr. Lee a party again Qinbei court and the defendant companies made new unreasonable demands, and its purpose and repeated words and deeds, but also to bring considerable pressure on the court.
 
As for the "defamation invasion" case to prosecute Mr. and Mrs. Li, Qinbei Court held that the civil complaint for the court hearing this particular time, place used to host the complaint only accommodating staff at the ready for destruction, and no public rumor. Lee said the party is seriously ill and missed the best time for treatment, and the resulting breakdown of marital relations, causing incalculable and indescribable damage to their family life and other consequences, there is no evidence of a causal relationship with indecent words, so It was ruled inadmissible.
 
Currently, Lee couple thereon to the Qinzhou City Intermediate People's Court on the petition filed, the court called for the repeal of the ruling Qinbei. & Nbsp; & nbsp;
 
Will prevent similar behavior can occur & nbsp;
 
According to reports,http://www.nonganxian.com/thread-210750-1-1.html, the issue of indecent words appear,http://forum.itac2.com/profile.php?id=6657, Qinbei up and down the court have actively communicate with each other. Sumou then write the same text content, aims to eliminate misunderstanding. After Sumou Lee came home, because everywhere know each other "petition complain," had an impact, there is no "do not reflect this matter to other sectors" of the situation.
 
After the incident, discipline inspection and supervision departments Qinbei court investigating the case back to the Lee couple and repeatedly patient and meticulous explanations and instructions to do the work.
 
In order to properly deal with the matter, Qinbei court leadership and discipline inspection departments, has repeatedly received the Lee et al. Last December 22, President of the Court,http://www.zhucheng163.com/forum.php?mod=viewthread&tid=751228, vice president and head of the discipline inspection departments, received Mr. Li and his mother, the investigation of the Court once again to inform each other, and bad words and deeds on behalf of the judges of the court to apologize, but also the judge has to inform the parties were criticized, the Court will strengthen team building and so on. "The other side has said it was far longer entangled, and thank sincerely court reception."
 
Qinbei Court held that, although indecent words written on the preparation of material destruction, there is no outward diffusion and propaganda, there is no adverse impact on the community, but that behavior contrary to the Judges' Code of Conduct (Trial) "requirement, the Court Judges on the parties were criticized, and ordered their nature have a profound understanding of the matter wrong, learn from it. The court will take warning, strengthening professional ethics of judges of regular education, in order to maintain impartiality of judges, to prevent similar behavior.